Posts Tagged ‘branding’

tumblr_lc8pebWUz71qf30hxo1_500_largeAs SXSW roars on and the interactive portion comes to a close, there’s a lot of chatter about the highs, lows and in-betweens. But through all the clutter, there are a handful of things that stuck out for me – and one that got stuck in my craw.

It has to do with companies and causes.

There are, of course, many variations of this conversation. One of them is brand as cause, like Love146 or the World Wildlife Fund. In other words, they are brands that exist wholly around the cause that they stand for. Then there are the ones that have a product, but stand for that one north star. Take Patagonia, for example, which is committed to helping the planet and makes sure everything they make and do supports that cause. Check out their Common Threads and 1% for the Planet programs, just to name a few (or the fact that after two or three times that they sent me a catalog and I didn’t order anything, they asked if they could take me off their mailing list to save paper). Or even Toms, a company that donates one pair of shoes to those in need for every one they sell.

And then there is, well, everyone else. And this is where the conversations I heard land. These people were saying that if your brand doesn’t stand for something – a cause, if you will – then people won’t care about it. And I absolutely agree. Where I absolutely disagree, however, is that your brand needs to align itself with something like saving the planet or curing cancer in order for people to care about you.

Let’s go ahead and get it out of the way: I’m not saying that’s a bad thing or even an ineffective thing. But experience has taught me that a brand can stand on its own as a cause, you just sometimes (okay, a lot of times) have to get your hands dirty to find it. And instead of having some arbitrary cause that sounds good, why not find the one that matters to your customers? For a crafting company, we found that their cause was to create a place that was safe online to share and celebrate each other’s work instead of the hostile communities that plagued the online space. For a city park client, it wasn’t planting trees and picking up trash. Their cause was celebrating the memories you make in a park with your family, your partner, etc. For a musical instruments initiative, it wasn’t about selling guitars and drum kits while looking for the next American Idol, but unlocking the music inside us all – no matter your skill level.

As an old colleague used to say, brands exist for two reasons: Solve my problem. And make me feel good. It’s no secret that people want to be a part of something bigger than themselves. But instead of looking outward for that cause, maybe you should look inward. Because when you find that thing to fight for, you a one step closer to putting a stake in the ground and defining who and what you are as a brand. And giving your customers something to fight far makes it even better.

Influence, influence, influence. We’re all talking about it – even if it’s only to complain about everyone talking about it (guilty). We’re trying to measure it. Quantify it. Identify it. Use it. Abuse it. Claim it. And the list goes on and on…

Of course, I’ve weighed in with my fair share of thoughts about how we’re making steps towards some sort of standard, but from the looks of things right now, we’re a long way off.

But I digress.

The point of this post is that I really don’t think that we should label those social media kids that brands try to get in front of as influencers. We should call them what they are: broadcasters.

If you haven’t read this gem of a post written by Zack Bussey that goes inside the mind of a typical “social media influencer” entitled “Social Media Influencers Suck,” you need to.

We feel we deserve it because of what we do after receiving it – we blog, tweet and share it on Facebook. Our blog readers read it, our thousands of followers on Twitter see it and our close friends on Facebook listen to what we say. Simply stated, we give you access to the people we know, and we’re giving it to you rather cheaply.

Read the whole thing. Seriously.

But when you read all the articles about what influence is and isn’t, when you dig into Klout and Kred and all the things written about them, when you get right down to it: these people are broadcasters. And that means that we’re back in a typical media placement cycle. Okay, maybe not typical, but you get the idea. There is an audience. There is a brand who wants access to the audience. A transaction takes place – sometimes paid, sometimes an experience, sometimes “gifted.” And then the brand is placed in front of audience for a limited amount of time.

Being on the PR/Branding/Marketing Communications side of the fence, I watch in awe at how a handful of these bloggers/influencers behave. And I’m fascinate at how these people – who claim to be marketing professionals – react and attack brands. Even at times holding them hostage. And they would never advise a client to act that way online. Yes, there are times when being outraged is warranted (like when they’re deliberately deceived) but other times, come on. They’re even attacking the very companies that have helped them get where they are. And on a side note, do they think that more brands will want to hire them because of this behavior? Do you think that more brands will even approach them in the future? Not likely.

I believe that they days of the social media influencer – as we know them – are numbered. A time is quickly approaching when brands will realize that there are other – more effective – ways to reach their audience and that in fact social media influencers are gatekeepers with no gates at all. They will be obsolete. And the playing field will be level.

Yeah, it's a random image. But I like it.

There is a phrase that I’ve been hearing people say over and over and over again lately. And I think that a lot of them are saying it just because they heard somebody else blurt it out and it sounded smart. I guess this is the part where you want to hear it for yourself:

“What you say about your brand isn’t as important as what other people say about your brand.”

Okay, yes. I get it. I get that the voice of the customer is important. Especially with the new age of social media, blah, blah, blah. But I’d like to challenge the statement, or at least get us to think about it. I’d venture to say that what you say about your brand IS AS IMPORTANT as what other people say about you.

Stay with me here. You have to give customers a frame of reference. Something to react to. Yes, it would help out your cause if what you say about yourself is accurate. This is the classic struggle between brand and reputation.

Boil it down to your personal brand. You know, you. Do you want other people to define who you are and what you think? Um, I don’t.

I think the best way to interpret that saying is that what other people say about you brings credibility to what you say about yourself. That’s the handshake. And that’s what we should be aiming for when it comes to our client’s brands.

Just something to chew on.

I was handed this business card on Friday night and stuck it in my pocket for several reasons, the foremost being that I liked the guy who handed it to me. But when I pulled it out again as I was emptying my pockets at home, it provided a nice refresher on some things that are easy to forget as we get bogged down in our daily workloads and putting out fires.

1) It’s the little things. Every touchpoint counts. Yes, everyone has a business card. Yes, they all have the basic info on there. But it’s just another chance to be memorable and provide a remarkable experience.

2) Don’t take yourself too seriously. As John Moore always says, “I don’t take myself very seriously, but I take what I do very seriously.” Eli gets that. Just look at the name of his company and the tagline. Which rolls right into:

3) Don’t try to be everything to everybody. Yes, times are tough. Yes, you need income. But when you being to dilute your offerings and go from specific to general, you’re only hurting yourself. You can’t do EVERYTHING well, so don’t try. This also goes for attracting kindred spirits. When you put yourself out there and really let your brand personality shine through, not everyone is going to like you. And that’s a GREAT thing. It weeds out the problem clients in the first place. So go with it. Don’t apologize for who you are. In fact embrace it, because it’s your greatest asset.

I know the above is basic. But sometimes it’s good to remind ourselves of the basics and be true to them. It can only enhance what you’re already out there doing. So consider this just a friendly little reminder…

I read the latest post from Geek Dad over at Wired today (Can Geek Culture Exist Without Brands?) and it has many thought-provoking topics packed in there. But to take one of the topics and run with it, in this brave new world of brands attempting to be relevant and even engage and participate in their customers’ lives, you, as a brand, can go in one of two ways:

1) You’re a beacon. You’re a gathering place for like-minded people. They follow your light and gather together where you provide a safe place for them to share their passions and enthusiasm about how you fit in their lives. When you’re beacon, you’re there because you’re goal is to DO THE RIGHT THING. You realize that increased sales is a byproduct of being transparent and honest and doing the best job you can to make your customers lives better by connecting to them and connecting them to one another.

From the Goonies...

2) You’re a booby trap. You have a lot of same elements of the beacon, but your bottom line drives everything. And when those curious people come near to you, you spring your trap, which can come in the form of you attacking them with empty shells of Twitter offers and Facebook fan pages. It’s trying to get them to talk about you instead of you talking about them. It’s putting yourself as number one and sure – you’re inviting people to the party – but it’s your party and you want everyone there to know it and talk about it.

Everyday you have a choice. Every internal strategy meeting and every chat with your agency is an opportunity to choose which path you will take. Will it be a beacon that people come to again and again, or will it be a booby trap that lures people in under false pretenses, springs a trap on them and watches them walk away, never to return?

© Copyright askspike.com. All Rights Reserved.