<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ask Spike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askspike.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askspike.com</link>
	<description>I&#039;ve got all my flags unfurled</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:22:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Business Means Cultural Change by Chris Baccus</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/05/15/social-business-means-cultural-change/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Baccus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=709#comment-629</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you ended where you did here.  I agree changing an entire culture is met with a ton of naysayers, especially many who thrive in the status quo.  So they have no motivation to change. 

I recall when I did a lot of research on when companies innovate.  It follows a bell curve. Basically, companies that are in their infancy are entrepreneurial and thriving with innovative ideas and experimenting with their company&#039;s culture.   Then the company&#039;s innovation plateaus. 

Innovation surges again near the death of a company, often when it is too late or the company becomes a shell of what they used to be.  They get truly innovative when they can no longer coast on what made them strong to begin with so they fight to survive.

Being a &#039;social business&#039; is a radical change and one customers are coming to expect more and more.  Though to be fair social media&#039;s impact on business is still small, but it is growing and consumers are more and more getting online to engage with companies on many levels. Smart companies will innovate in a way you outlined above.  Expecting them all to become Zappos or some other hot company who has adapted social business is as you say very hard.

Anyway great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you ended where you did here.  I agree changing an entire culture is met with a ton of naysayers, especially many who thrive in the status quo.  So they have no motivation to change. </p>
<p>I recall when I did a lot of research on when companies innovate.  It follows a bell curve. Basically, companies that are in their infancy are entrepreneurial and thriving with innovative ideas and experimenting with their company&#8217;s culture.   Then the company&#8217;s innovation plateaus. </p>
<p>Innovation surges again near the death of a company, often when it is too late or the company becomes a shell of what they used to be.  They get truly innovative when they can no longer coast on what made them strong to begin with so they fight to survive.</p>
<p>Being a &#8216;social business&#8217; is a radical change and one customers are coming to expect more and more.  Though to be fair social media&#8217;s impact on business is still small, but it is growing and consumers are more and more getting online to engage with companies on many levels. Smart companies will innovate in a way you outlined above.  Expecting them all to become Zappos or some other hot company who has adapted social business is as you say very hard.</p>
<p>Anyway great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Business Means Cultural Change by Bruce Wilson</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/05/15/social-business-means-cultural-change/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=709#comment-628</guid>
		<description>It is certainly interesting to watch the mass blundering forward taking place in social business/media. In the aggregate it looks like a lot of people with their arms held out in front of themselves, taking cautious little steps and bumping into stuff, and each other, while each trumpets the benefits of their direction. In contrast the word of mouth projects you&#039;ve been involved in sound refreshingly well-formed: Do you have time (and permissions) to share one or two case studies in a blog post some time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly interesting to watch the mass blundering forward taking place in social business/media. In the aggregate it looks like a lot of people with their arms held out in front of themselves, taking cautious little steps and bumping into stuff, and each other, while each trumpets the benefits of their direction. In contrast the word of mouth projects you&#8217;ve been involved in sound refreshingly well-formed: Do you have time (and permissions) to share one or two case studies in a blog post some time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Business Means Cultural Change by Amber</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/05/15/social-business-means-cultural-change/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=709#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Great post. I sometimes think that it will take the next generation of leaders for big changes. Changes in the industry (PR) have been easy for me to adapt to and I have loved them...but it is still so hard for others to accept and trust. Until then, I will be making small changes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I sometimes think that it will take the next generation of leaders for big changes. Changes in the industry (PR) have been easy for me to adapt to and I have loved them&#8230;but it is still so hard for others to accept and trust. Until then, I will be making small changes. <img src='http://askspike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They&#8217;re not influencers, they&#8217;re broadcasters by sea</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2011/10/10/theyre-not-influencers-theyre-broadcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>sea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=571#comment-624</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d call them amplifiers rather than broadcasters
For me, the entire social network communication aspect is an AMPLIFIER.

intereastingly i sense it amplifies in 2 distinct ways
- activates megaphone -- (aka reminds me i have a voice (megaphone shifted from mass communication methods to me))
- increases range of megaphone to anyone+anywhere+anytime


for me, my thinking is currently, the channel is COMMUNITY
and that typically happens offline
so community is not profit driven
its about being human, living, sharing, growing and helping
instrinic qualities.

---
brands are external things
external constructs
a tool &#039;to be cool&#039;
if cool matters to you

---
so I&#039;m with &quot;Nick Taylor&quot; who replied first to this post 
&quot;being authentic&quot;, being genuine is KING.
no more faking it.
enough is really enough.

the power of word of mouth -- power of community
is resurging


Nike&#039;s comment was:
&quot;A race against time then… maybe… because coming the other way, is this possibility that “brands” are utterly meaningless constructs.

Brands are just stories about companies that don’t actually do what they say they do. They want to be “transparent”… they need to be, to have any degree of authenticity… but they outsource production, they outsource design, they outsource marketing… all they’re really doing is borrowing money and running a spreadsheet.

Brands? Brands are fake. Brands suck. Nobody cares about brands.
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d call them amplifiers rather than broadcasters<br />
For me, the entire social network communication aspect is an AMPLIFIER.</p>
<p>intereastingly i sense it amplifies in 2 distinct ways<br />
- activates megaphone &#8212; (aka reminds me i have a voice (megaphone shifted from mass communication methods to me))<br />
- increases range of megaphone to anyone+anywhere+anytime</p>
<p>for me, my thinking is currently, the channel is COMMUNITY<br />
and that typically happens offline<br />
so community is not profit driven<br />
its about being human, living, sharing, growing and helping<br />
instrinic qualities.</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
brands are external things<br />
external constructs<br />
a tool &#8216;to be cool&#8217;<br />
if cool matters to you</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
so I&#8217;m with &#8220;Nick Taylor&#8221; who replied first to this post<br />
&#8220;being authentic&#8221;, being genuine is KING.<br />
no more faking it.<br />
enough is really enough.</p>
<p>the power of word of mouth &#8212; power of community<br />
is resurging</p>
<p>Nike&#8217;s comment was:<br />
&#8220;A race against time then… maybe… because coming the other way, is this possibility that “brands” are utterly meaningless constructs.</p>
<p>Brands are just stories about companies that don’t actually do what they say they do. They want to be “transparent”… they need to be, to have any degree of authenticity… but they outsource production, they outsource design, they outsource marketing… all they’re really doing is borrowing money and running a spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Brands? Brands are fake. Brands suck. Nobody cares about brands.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solving the “Measuring Influence” Problem by sea</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/01/11/solving-the-measuring-influence-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>sea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=643#comment-623</guid>
		<description>in my world, it is more helpful to know if they think it is possible or not.  possibility is the gatekeeper to if individual&#039;s  enter &quot;open to be influenced to purchase arena&quot;.  
If one thinks its a fruitloop concept/stupid/mutter under breath/shake their head, this often means it is outside possibility in the individual&#039;s world.  That&#039;s how our rational mind automatically responds (why - i&#039;ll park that for now).   So 2 scenarios
-- possibility doesnt exist
-- possibility exists
influence to purchase will happen as a result of both
but who/how/cudos for influence is very different in each scenario

the impact of &quot;possibility exist/not&quot; on the &quot;influence&quot; dynamic, increases at an exponential rate the more the individual becomes self-aware.  e.g. own their own thinking, understanding how they think, what causes thinking, understands paradigms, can be observer versus ABSORBER of life... blah blah blah...

so I sense ... shifting the focus a little bit back... before the &quot;influencer of purchase&quot;.... will bring greater results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my world, it is more helpful to know if they think it is possible or not.  possibility is the gatekeeper to if individual&#8217;s  enter &#8220;open to be influenced to purchase arena&#8221;.<br />
If one thinks its a fruitloop concept/stupid/mutter under breath/shake their head, this often means it is outside possibility in the individual&#8217;s world.  That&#8217;s how our rational mind automatically responds (why &#8211; i&#8217;ll park that for now).   So 2 scenarios<br />
&#8211; possibility doesnt exist<br />
&#8211; possibility exists<br />
influence to purchase will happen as a result of both<br />
but who/how/cudos for influence is very different in each scenario</p>
<p>the impact of &#8220;possibility exist/not&#8221; on the &#8220;influence&#8221; dynamic, increases at an exponential rate the more the individual becomes self-aware.  e.g. own their own thinking, understanding how they think, what causes thinking, understands paradigms, can be observer versus ABSORBER of life&#8230; blah blah blah&#8230;</p>
<p>so I sense &#8230; shifting the focus a little bit back&#8230; before the &#8220;influencer of purchase&#8221;&#8230;. will bring greater results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe 1% is all you need by Mike Grace</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/04/09/maybe-1-is-all-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=690#comment-622</guid>
		<description>&quot;So before you go wringing your hands about only having a 1% engagement rate on Facebook, think about it differently. Like what you can do with that 1%. Ohhhh, the possibilities.&quot; Reminds me of MacGyver : ) You can do amazing things with what you have if you take action and pay attention to what&#039;s around you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So before you go wringing your hands about only having a 1% engagement rate on Facebook, think about it differently. Like what you can do with that 1%. Ohhhh, the possibilities.&#8221; Reminds me of MacGyver : ) You can do amazing things with what you have if you take action and pay attention to what&#8217;s around you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes, the Best Content is Given Away by Mike Grace</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/03/21/sometimes-the-best-content-is-given-away/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=683#comment-617</guid>
		<description>+1 for context! I love the idea of shining the spotlight on the customers and then letting the word of mouth spread like wildfire : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for context! I love the idea of shining the spotlight on the customers and then letting the word of mouth spread like wildfire : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect Your Ambassadors by John D'Ambrogio</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/01/26/protect-your-ambassadors/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>John D'Ambrogio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=669#comment-609</guid>
		<description>...and there is nothing worth than an alienated ambassador!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and there is nothing worth than an alienated ambassador!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who is this guy? by Newsletter #871: The &#8220;Update on Our Amazing Word of Mouth Projects&#8221; Special Issue &#124; Andy Sernovitz &#124; Damn, I Wish I&#039;d Thought of That!</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsletter #871: The &#8220;Update on Our Amazing Word of Mouth Projects&#8221; Special Issue &#124; Andy Sernovitz &#124; Damn, I Wish I&#039;d Thought of That!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?page_id=2#comment-606</guid>
		<description>[...] how real companies actually do it, and it&#8217;s all being presented by word of mouth legends like Spike Jones, John Moore, Saul Colt, Rick Murray, Dave Kerpen, Geno Church, and yours [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how real companies actually do it, and it&#8217;s all being presented by word of mouth legends like Spike Jones, John Moore, Saul Colt, Rick Murray, Dave Kerpen, Geno Church, and yours [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meet in the Middle by Jarrad</title>
		<link>http://askspike.com/2012/02/14/meet-in-the-middle/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askspike.com/?p=673#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Great post Spike! It would be great if there was a tweet button so I could share these gems with my followers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Spike! It would be great if there was a tweet button so I could share these gems with my followers <img src='http://askspike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

